Overpopulation affects the natural environment
The current population of the Earth is
almost 7.6 billion people and growing. It is projected to reach over 8 billion
by 2025, 9 billion by 2040, and a whopping 11 billion by 2100. Population
is growing rapidly, far outpacing the ability of our planet to support it,
given current practices.
Overpopulation
is associated with negative environmental and economic outcomes ranging
from the impacts of over-farming, deforestation, and water pollution to
eutrophication and global warming. While a lot of positive steps are being
taken to better ensure the sustainability of humans on our planet, the problem
of having too many people has made lasting solutions more challenging to find.
What is Overpopulation?
The term
overpopulation is used to describe a situation in which the world or area has a
population so large that the people there are suffering as a result. In other
words, the population exceeds the region or planet's carrying capacity--the
number of people, other living organisms, or crops that can be supported
without environmental degradation. Their suffering may include a shortage
of food, limited access to healthcare and other public services, overcrowding,
and high unemployment.
Causes of Overpopulation
Overpopulation
is largely attributed to trends stemming from spike in birth rates in the mid-20th
century. Overpopulation of specific locations
can also result from migration. Oddly enough, the overpopulation of an area can
occur without a net gain of population. It can result from a population with an
economy reliant on exports outgrowing its carrying capacity coupled with slim
changes of migration. This has been called "demographic entrapment."
Environmental Effects of Overpopulation
The
relationship between overpopulation and environmental impacts are often
interrelated and complex. Below are some of the key sustainability
challenges associated with overpopulation. For the sake of simplicity they are
listed separately, but understand the connections between them are complicated,
which makes them more challenging to manage.
Farming impacts
A
growing agricultural base to feed an expanding world population comes with its
own complications. As the global population increases, more food is needed. Such
measures may be met through more intensive farming, or through deforestation to
create new farm lands, which in turn can have negative
outcomes. Agriculture is responsible for about 80 percent of
deforestation, worldwide.
The
yield of existing farmland can be increased through intensive farming to feed
our rapidly growing population. This approach is characterized by reliance on
mechanization, pesticides and chemical fertilizers. Such practices
can be associated with soil erosion or depletion. According to the World
Wildlife Fund, the land used and abandoned in the last 50 years globally may be
equal to the amount of land used today. As well, the agricultural runoff
of excess fertilizers is one of the main causes of eutrophication, which
depletes waters from oxygen and results in significant negative impacts for
marine life.
Deforestation
Deforestation
in turn leads to a reduced ability to capture CO2, thus exasperating the
greenhouse gas problem. Deforestation is also strongly associated with loss of
habitat and extinctions. Agriculture, as mentioned above, is responsible for
nearly 80% of global deforestation. Another 14 percent is attributed to
logging, 5 percent to firewood collection, and the balance resulting from other
causes.
Human
population increase is related to all of these deforestation pressures. More
people means we need more food, more wood products, and more firewood.
Eutrophication
Agricultural
runoff is one of the main causes of eutrophication, the presence of excessive
nutrients in bodies of waster. Worldwide, there are more than 400 marine 'dead
zones' caused by eutrophication, collectively covering an area
six times the size of Switzerland.
Eutrophication
causes the dense growth of plant life that consumes oxygen, resulting in the
death of aquatic animals. Other major sources of eutrophication are industry
and sewage disposal--both related to population growth. The cost of mediating
eutrophication in the U.S., in 2013, was estimated at over over $2.2 billion
annually. Recent research points out that there
are other important impacts other than food production, such as clothing and
manufactured good production. Cotton or linen production, for example, can
involve direct agricultural impacts. The use of fossil fuel for electrical
production to power factories also creates combustion by-product emissions,
which can ultimately be absorbed by oceans through rainwater.
Loss of Fresh Water
While
there is plenty of water on the planet, it is very much a scarce resource. Only
2.5 percent of water resources are fresh water, and just a small fraction of
that is available as unpolluted drinking water.
One of
the by-products of population growth has been stress on freshwater supplies.
"Water stressed" is defined as a case of demand exceeding the supply
of suitable water available. According to one report, around 40 percent of the
world's population endure water scarcity, and that amount has been projected to
skyrocket by 2030 as global demand for water increases by 50 percent. Another
commentator expects 2/3 of the world's population to be living with water
shortages by 2025, which he attributes to population growth. Also consider that
population growth is most rapid in part of the world where water is in high
demand already, such as Africa and Asia.
Global Warming
Human
population growth and climate change have grown hand in hand as the use of
fossil fuels has exploded to support industrialized societies. More people
necessitates more demand for oil, coal, gas, and other energy sources extracted
from below the Earth’s surface that spew carbon dioxide (CO2) into the
atmosphere when burned, trapping warm air inside like a greenhouse. Most fossil
fuel consumption comes from developed countries. It is a
sobering thought that most developing nations aspire to similar industrial
economies as they experience economic growth, which further escalates CO2
emissions into the atmosphere.
Deforestation
is another important component of greenhouse gas emissions. Globally, forests
store more than twice the amount of carbon dioxide than is found in the atmosphere. As
forests are cleared and burned, that CO2 is released into the atmosphere,
accounting for an estimated 12 percent of total greenhouse gas production.
Outlook for Overpopulation and Sustainability
There
are issues aplenty to overcome. Clearly, initiatives to switch to clean energy
sources such as solar, improve agricultural practices, better manage water
resources and fully embrace the principles of the circular economy will help us
mitigate the impact of population growth. At the other end of the spectrum,
policies that encourage family planning, education, gender equity and other
measures to help slow population growth will help reduce pressure on the
planet. Take time to understand the issues, and support policies that will make
a difference.
Conclusion
Soil erosion is a natural process but one that is being rapidly
accelerated due to human activities. Most of these activities are related to
agriculture and so to slow them down we must look for more sustainable
innovative solutions that can help restore and maintain the health of our
precious soils.
Very informative content 👍
ReplyDeleteGood analysis
ReplyDeleteInformative
ReplyDeleteNice
ReplyDeleteWe should analyze the effects in more detail
ReplyDelete